Rhetoric and sophistry in philosophy......?
sophistry , rhetorical debating devalued philosophy. such disingenuous , flawed debate readily scrutinised , disproven, , philosophy thereby. metaphysical mind can simplify complex affected , sincere application of apparent truths can offer pearls seekers of truth thereafter construct chains of theoretical analysis.
sophisticate sole intent , purpose appear erudite may impressive in eloquence yet without fundamental application of logic , sequential reasoning found little more rhetorical sophisticate.
vital , essential ingredient therefore love. love of absolutism in truth, in benefaction others sole aim of enlightening , enhancing thinking capability. secret , foundational premise upon true philosophers , metaphysicians base reasoning. else invalidated easily.
indeed such contentious practices should not disregarded disseminated casting doubt upon sound , immutable truth. philosophy love of wisdom, love should remain primary operative , motivator.
what role did rhetoric , sophistry have in shaping philosophy? should 2 such contentious practices have been disregarded when applying philosophical analysis?
Arts & Humanities Philosophy Next
Comments
Post a Comment