Rhetoric and sophistry in philosophy......?


sophistry , rhetorical debating devalued philosophy. such disingenuous , flawed debate readily scrutinised , disproven, , philosophy thereby. metaphysical mind can simplify complex affected , sincere application of apparent truths can offer pearls seekers of truth thereafter construct chains of theoretical analysis.

sophisticate sole intent , purpose appear erudite may impressive in eloquence yet without fundamental application of logic , sequential reasoning found little more rhetorical sophisticate.

vital , essential ingredient therefore love. love of absolutism in truth, in benefaction others sole aim of enlightening , enhancing thinking capability. secret , foundational premise upon true philosophers , metaphysicians base reasoning. else invalidated easily.

indeed such contentious practices should not disregarded disseminated casting doubt upon sound , immutable truth. philosophy love of wisdom, love should remain primary operative , motivator.

what role did rhetoric , sophistry have in shaping philosophy? should 2 such contentious practices have been disregarded when applying philosophical analysis?


Arts & Humanities Philosophy Next



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is actually SEO?Is it only meta tags?Elaborate.?

Should India fight Terrorism or fight simply Pakistan ?