In the long run, which $$ investment better benefits the nation: financial bailouts,or for the war on terror?
in light of recent events, "government" , use term loosely, has no intent rescue financial market. witnessing inevitable reaction debt based market , feds attempt regulate , control it. swindle more money citizen in form of tax revenue. using more of same medicine, stuff brought point cure nothing. in end have succuedded in destroying dollar. not accept ideal "they" blind this.
so, there must different motive. if gov. wanted solve financial mess in, why not attack real culprit. runaway system of credit allowed fed, , artificial inflation of realestate manipulating interest rates. not happen because mean housing prices have fall. price of goods , services fall well. wages fall allowing manufacturing jobs return , have productive thriving economy again. , allow acquisition of property without use of credit, taking power away central bank. imagine buying car, boat or house cash on mid range salary.
let banks go under, @ worst loose value in our homes, , securities, short term. market rebound , taking away power of banks issue credit, resort saving money again. "solution" of bail outs make matters worse in future, , provide federal dominance on banks. 1 bad, other worse.
instead, better off fighting perpetual war on terror. war rich, makes slaughter of poor anonymous business.
in opinion, these billions best spent benefit american people... financial bailouts of major wall street players, or war on terror in iraq , afghanistan? or perhaps can suggest third better place invest money... our money?
Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government Next
Comments
Post a Comment